Full paper submission

Your IDTitle of your abstractYour full paper
01Probabilistic Hazard Incorporating 3-D Simulations into Non-Ergodic Ground-Motion ModelsID-01-Abrahamson.pdf
02ON NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTIONS OF NORMAL AND REVERSE FAULTS FROM VIEWPOINT OF DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODELAochi_BestPSHANI2018_v2.docx
03Validation of synthetic ground motions based on stochastic finite fault models using observed records during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake20180330_2ndWS-BestPSHANI2018_M.Aoki.docx
04A DOUBLE-CORNER SOURCE SPECTRUM FOR 5.3 ≤ M ≤ 7.7 THAT PREDICTS PGA, PGV, DURATION, RADIATED ENERGY AND APPARENT STRESSdouble_corner_manuscript-3_27_18_v1.pdf
05From Seismic Sources to Engineering Demand Parameters: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Estimation of Seismic Losses in Urban RegionsAskan_et_al_Full_Paper_BestPSHANI_2018.pdf
06The interface between empirical and simulation-based ground-motion modelsBestPSHANI2018_Atkinson.pdf
07Site-specific seismic fragility functions based on ground motion simulation
08Are the standard Vs30-kappa host-to-target adjustments the best way to get consistent hard-rock ground motion prediction?08.pdf
09Statistical analysis of non-linear site response : consistency and discrepancies between instrumental data and numerical simulations
10AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO PERFORM SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES THROUGH THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY SINAPS@ RESEARCH PROJECTBestPSHANI2018_Full-paper-SINAPS@-Intro-April2018F.pdf
11The Bayesian Model Averaging of Ground-Motion Prediction Equationsproceeding.pdf
12BIASED AND GENUINE INFLUENCES OF THE CLIMATIC CYCLES ON THE CRUSTAL DEFORMATION AND SEISMICITY
13Lessons Learned from the Sinop NPP SSHAC Process
14Different measures of ground motion duration: implications for evaluating site-effects and generating adjustable response spectra
15Correlation of earthquake source parameters
16Earthquakes and ground-motion variabilities: evaluation and impacts on physics based ground-motions simulations and associated probabilistic seismic hazard assessments
17Asperity models to predict surface fault displacement caused by earthquakes: The 2010 Mw 7.0 Darfield (New Zealand) earthquakeBestPSHANI2018_Dalguer_etal.pdf
18Procedure of evaluating fault parameters of subduction plate-boundary earthquakes in the second and third stages for strong motion prediction2018.02.23-IAEA.docx
19Calibrating the backbone approach for the development of earthquake ground motion modelsBestPSHANI2018_JohnDouglas.docx
20Challenges for near-field ground-motion modelling using extended-fault rupture in moderate seismicity areas: model parameters and data.
21Physically based Seismic Hazard assessment for Egypt and its implication on Critical structureselgabry_etal_2018.pdf
22Capturing source parameters that most control the variability of near-fault surface ground motionsID-22_Fayjaloun_et_al.pdf
23CURRENT STATUS AND ISSUES OF STRONG-MOTION PREDICTION METHOD IN SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR THE NATIONAL SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS FOR JAPANPaper_fujiwara_v0_F4.docx
24Broadband dynamic source model for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake inspired by slip reactivation and EGF simulationBestPSHANIpaper_submission_tohoku.pdf
25Broad-band 3-D physics-based simulation of earthquake-induced wave-field at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant (Japan): an all-embracing source-to-site approach.FG_BestPSHANI2018.pdf
26Lessons learned from the GMPE developments and the need for filling the gaps in empirical data for reliable seismic hazard estimates
27Developing Site-Specific Vertical Ground Motions for TurkeyBestPSHANI2018_Gulerceetal_v3.pdf
28NONLINEAR BEHAVIORS AND STRUCTURAL DAMPING IDENTIFICATION IN REINFORCED CONCRETE ELEMENTSArticle_BESTPSHANI.pdf
29SEISMIC ATTENUATION AT DEPTH:HERNANDEZ2018-Hualien-proceeding-2nd-Workshop-BestPSHANI.pdf
30The Argostoli Sinaps@ test-site: a tool for simulation validation and for a better understanding of phenomena involved in seismic hazard assessment.
31Numerical Analysis of Surface Earthquake Fault Using High Performance ComputingID-31_HORI-Muneo_HPC4AF_r1_IS.pdf
32Nanoseismic Monitoring of an Engineering Scaled Excavation in Federal District, Brazil
33Examination of RSQSim applied to a physics-based PSHA using Empirical Green’s Functions
34The new BBToolbox v2.0: a revised tool to compute hybrid synthetic seismograms
35Evaluation of off-fault displacements during 2016 Kumamoto earthquakeBestPSHANI2018_INOUE_r3.1.docx
36Extension of strong-motion-prediction recipe for near-source long-period ground motions: Validation of ground motions for the 2016 Mw 7.0 Kumamoto earthquake in JapanBestPSHANI2018_irikura_final-final_rev_rev.docx
37Interface Between Earthquake Ground Motions and Structural Response: Numerical Modeling and Simulation of Earthquake Soil Structure Interaction BehaviorJeremic_et_al_BestPSHANI_2018.pdf
38SCALING LAWS OF FAULT PARAMETERS OF INTRA-SLAB EARTHQUAKES AND STRONG GROUND MOTION SIMULATION2018.02.23-IAEA_Ju1.pdf
39HYBRID GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS FOR THE WESTERN PART OF TURKEY (DUZCE) AND BUILDING RESPONSE ESTIMATIONShaghayegh_KARIMZADEH-NAGHSHINEH.pdf
40PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE SLIP DISTRIBUTION ON THE VERTICAL STRIKE-SLIP FAULT FOR DIFFERENT SOURCE PARAMETERS BASED ON THE DYNAMIC RUPTURE SIMULATIONBestPSHANI2018_Paper_ManpoPitarkaKawase.v2.2.pdf
41CONSTRUCTION OF A HIGH-RESOLUTION 3-DIMENSIONAL S-WAVE VELOCITY STRUCTURE MODEL BASED ON JOINT INVERSION METHOD INTEGRATING VARIOUS KINDS OF GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL DATABestPSHANI2018_NRA_G.Kobayashi.pdf
42INTERACTION BETWEEN BUILDINGS: EXPERIMENTAL CAMPAIGNBestPSHANI2018_VC.docx
43RE-EVALUATION OF SEISMIC HAZARD AT OLKILUOTO AND LOVIISA NPP SITES IN FINLAND
44Precariously balanced rocks as indicators of seismic hazard
45Development and operation of seismic observation system in deep boreholeBestPSHANI2018_NRA_Y.Mamada.pdf
46Lessons Learned from the Sinop NPP SSHAC ProcessBestPSHANI2018_SinopPaper_martinetal.pdf
47Scaling relationships of source parameters of inland crustal earthquakes in tectonically active regionsBestPSHANI_miya_full12_20180330submission2.pdf
48Seismic Performance of Spent Fuel Pool For Reactor Triga Puspati
49ANALYSIS OF THE SPATIAL CORRELATION OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION FROM PHYSICS-BASED NUMERICAL SIMULATIONSBestPSHANI_Paolucci_v8.docx
50Earthquake cycle modeling of multi-segmented faults: dynamic rupture and ground motion simulation of the 1992 Mw 7.3 Landers earthquakeBestPSHANIpaperLanders-final.pdf
51Physics Based Simulations of the M7 Kumamoto, Japan Earthquake: Implication of Rupture Models for Near-Fault Ground Motion Variability EstimatesBestPSHANI2018_Paper.docx
52Recent studies on the Diendorf fault in the Czech Republic
53MUTI-LEVEL MODELLING APPROACH OF RC STRUCTURES UNDER EARTHQUAKE LOADING: CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE SINAPS@ PROJECTBestPSHANI2018_WP3_Final_Ragueneau.pdf
54progress in the understanding and modelling of components that could drive the overall fragiliy of a nuclear power plantframatome_final.docx
55Broadband (0-10 Hz) Fully Deterministic Three-Dimensional High-Performance Computing Simulations of Large Earthquake (MW 6.5-7.2) Ground Motions for Generic Strike-Slip Faults and the Hayward Fault, Northern California
56Discontinuous-mesh Finite Difference Simulations of M9 Megathrust Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zonebestpshani2018_roten_v2.pdf
57Rupture scenario models in complex fault systemsVisini_et_alii_fullpaper.pdf
58Gutenberg-Richter’s b-value and earthquake asperity modelsPiotr_Senatorski_best_pshani_2018.pdf
59GITEC project: an international benchmark to improve generalized spectral inversion techniquesGITEC_IAEA_HS_FH_db_pt.pdf
60Simulation of Strong Ground Motions for M9 Megathrust Earthquake using M7 Class earthquake records as Modified Empirical Green’s FunctionsBestPSHANI2018_Paper_Si-and-Irikura2.pdf
61From seismic hazard to structural design and analysis: coherence of approaches
62Worst Case Scenario Rupture Models for Installation of Critical Infrastructure
63Strong pulses near source faults generated during the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakesSomei_et_al_2018BestPSHANi_proc_039_fin.pdf
64Outline of the PFDHA Method and Recent Studies on PFDHA in JapanTAKAO_submission.docx
65A Preliminary Study to Investigate the Regional Effects on Ground-Motion Predictive Models for TurkeyBestPSHANI2018_TanircanFinalsubmitted.docx
66The use of stochastic slip models in Probabilistic Tsunami and Displacement Hazard Analysis
67Analysis of Sub-soil Radon gas for Seismic precursor using SMARTRnDuo and comparing the Effectiveness of Soil probe and Radon exhalation chamber in detecting Sub-soil radon gas variation in Mizoram, India.
68Argostoli site, from site test to numerical model: a holistic approachID_68_TOUHAMI-Sara_Article_ST_FV.pdf
69Framework for Non-Structural Component Fragility Curve Estimation Using Synthetic Ground Motions with Conditional SpectraBestPSHANI2018_Paper_TrevlopoulosZentner_20190315.docx
70Dynamic Rupture Simulations to Investigate the Behavior of the M7-M8 Class Earthquakes Deduced from the Tohoku EarthquakeFrance2018paper20180226JPAcheck1.docx
71Improving the characterization of small and intermediate earthquakes through the French metropolitan territory for future physic-based rupture models
72NEW ADVANCES IN THE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT FROM THE SINAPS@ PROJECTBestPSHANI2018_Paper-SINAPS_FRS_new_methods_FV_BR_EHS_FV.pdf
73EQUIPMENT'S SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVE ESTIMATION USING SIGNALS GENERATED WITH GMPEs - CASE STUDY ON THE KASHIWAZAKI-KARIWA POWER PLANTBestPSHANI2018_WangFeau_V1h.docx
74Uncertainty analysis relevant to the fault modeling methodUncertaintyAnalysis_WU_JNRA_r6.pdf
75EXAMIN: Development of an integrated approach for seismic risk and loss assessment based on “physics-based” wave propagation simulation accounting for local and regional variability.BestPSHANI2018_Paper-EXAMIN.pdf
76Conceptual Framework for Physics-Based Simulations in Practical Projects and Interface to Engineering DemandsBestPSHANI2018_Paper_Renault.docx
77ANALYSIS OF THE SPATIAL CORRELATION OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION FROM PHYSICS-BASED NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS
78Should we go ahead with the response spectrum?ID78_LABBE-Pierre_2018-BestPSHANI.pdf
Your IDTitle of your abstractYour full paper