01 | Probabilistic Hazard Incorporating 3-D Simulations into Non-Ergodic Ground-Motion Models | ID-01-Abrahamson.pdf |
02 | ON NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTIONS OF NORMAL AND REVERSE FAULTS FROM VIEWPOINT OF DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODEL | Aochi_BestPSHANI2018_v2.docx |
03 | Validation of synthetic ground motions based on stochastic finite fault models using observed records during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake | 20180330_2ndWS-BestPSHANI2018_M.Aoki.docx |
04 | A DOUBLE-CORNER SOURCE SPECTRUM FOR 5.3 ≤ M ≤ 7.7 THAT PREDICTS PGA, PGV, DURATION, RADIATED ENERGY AND APPARENT STRESS | double_corner_manuscript-3_27_18_v1.pdf |
05 | From Seismic Sources to Engineering Demand Parameters: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Estimation of Seismic Losses in Urban Regions | Askan_et_al_Full_Paper_BestPSHANI_2018.pdf |
06 | The interface between empirical and simulation-based ground-motion models | BestPSHANI2018_Atkinson.pdf |
07 | Site-specific seismic fragility functions based on ground motion simulation | |
08 | Are the standard Vs30-kappa host-to-target adjustments the best way to get consistent hard-rock ground motion prediction? | 08.pdf |
09 | Statistical analysis of non-linear site response : consistency and discrepancies between instrumental data and numerical simulations | |
10 | AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO PERFORM SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES THROUGH THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY SINAPS@ RESEARCH PROJECT | BestPSHANI2018_Full-paper-SINAPS@-Intro-April2018F.pdf |
11 | The Bayesian Model Averaging of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations | proceeding.pdf |
12 | BIASED AND GENUINE INFLUENCES OF THE CLIMATIC CYCLES ON THE CRUSTAL DEFORMATION AND SEISMICITY | |
13 | Lessons Learned from the Sinop NPP SSHAC Process | |
14 | Different measures of ground motion duration: implications for evaluating site-effects and generating adjustable response spectra | |
15 | Correlation of earthquake source parameters | |
16 | Earthquakes and ground-motion variabilities: evaluation and impacts on physics based ground-motions simulations and associated probabilistic seismic hazard assessments | |
17 | Asperity models to predict surface fault displacement caused by earthquakes: The 2010 Mw 7.0 Darfield (New Zealand) earthquake | BestPSHANI2018_Dalguer_etal.pdf |
18 | Procedure of evaluating fault parameters of subduction plate-boundary earthquakes in the second and third stages for strong motion prediction | 2018.02.23-IAEA.docx |
19 | Calibrating the backbone approach for the development of earthquake ground motion models | BestPSHANI2018_JohnDouglas.docx |
20 | Challenges for near-field ground-motion modelling using extended-fault rupture in moderate seismicity areas: model parameters and data. | |
21 | Physically based Seismic Hazard assessment for Egypt and its implication on Critical structures | elgabry_etal_2018.pdf |
22 | Capturing source parameters that most control the variability of near-fault surface ground motions | ID-22_Fayjaloun_et_al.pdf |
23 | CURRENT STATUS AND ISSUES OF STRONG-MOTION PREDICTION METHOD IN SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR THE NATIONAL SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS FOR JAPAN | Paper_fujiwara_v0_F4.docx |
24 | Broadband dynamic source model for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake inspired by slip reactivation and EGF simulation | BestPSHANIpaper_submission_tohoku.pdf |
25 | Broad-band 3-D physics-based simulation of earthquake-induced wave-field at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant (Japan): an all-embracing source-to-site approach. | FG_BestPSHANI2018.pdf |
26 | Lessons learned from the GMPE developments and the need for filling the gaps in empirical data for reliable seismic hazard estimates | |
27 | Developing Site-Specific Vertical Ground Motions for Turkey | BestPSHANI2018_Gulerceetal_v3.pdf |
28 | NONLINEAR BEHAVIORS AND STRUCTURAL DAMPING IDENTIFICATION IN REINFORCED CONCRETE ELEMENTS | Article_BESTPSHANI.pdf |
29 | SEISMIC ATTENUATION AT DEPTH: | HERNANDEZ2018-Hualien-proceeding-2nd-Workshop-BestPSHANI.pdf |
30 | The Argostoli Sinaps@ test-site: a tool for simulation validation and for a better understanding of phenomena involved in seismic hazard assessment. | |
31 | Numerical Analysis of Surface Earthquake Fault Using High Performance Computing | ID-31_HORI-Muneo_HPC4AF_r1_IS.pdf |
32 | Nanoseismic Monitoring of an Engineering Scaled Excavation in Federal District, Brazil | |
33 | Examination of RSQSim applied to a physics-based PSHA using Empirical Green’s Functions | |
34 | The new BBToolbox v2.0: a revised tool to compute hybrid synthetic seismograms | |
35 | Evaluation of off-fault displacements during 2016 Kumamoto earthquake | BestPSHANI2018_INOUE_r3.1.docx |
36 | Extension of strong-motion-prediction recipe for near-source long-period ground motions: Validation of ground motions for the 2016 Mw 7.0 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan | BestPSHANI2018_irikura_final-final_rev_rev.docx |
37 | Interface Between Earthquake Ground Motions and Structural Response: Numerical Modeling and Simulation of Earthquake Soil Structure Interaction Behavior | Jeremic_et_al_BestPSHANI_2018.pdf |
38 | SCALING LAWS OF FAULT PARAMETERS OF INTRA-SLAB EARTHQUAKES AND STRONG GROUND MOTION SIMULATION | 2018.02.23-IAEA_Ju1.pdf |
39 | HYBRID GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS FOR THE WESTERN PART OF TURKEY (DUZCE) AND BUILDING RESPONSE ESTIMATION | Shaghayegh_KARIMZADEH-NAGHSHINEH.pdf |
40 | PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE SLIP DISTRIBUTION ON THE VERTICAL STRIKE-SLIP FAULT FOR DIFFERENT SOURCE PARAMETERS BASED ON THE DYNAMIC RUPTURE SIMULATION | BestPSHANI2018_Paper_ManpoPitarkaKawase.v2.2.pdf |
41 | CONSTRUCTION OF A HIGH-RESOLUTION 3-DIMENSIONAL S-WAVE VELOCITY STRUCTURE MODEL BASED ON JOINT INVERSION METHOD INTEGRATING VARIOUS KINDS OF GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL DATA | BestPSHANI2018_NRA_G.Kobayashi.pdf |
42 | INTERACTION BETWEEN BUILDINGS: EXPERIMENTAL CAMPAIGN | BestPSHANI2018_VC.docx |
43 | RE-EVALUATION OF SEISMIC HAZARD AT OLKILUOTO AND LOVIISA NPP SITES IN FINLAND | ID-49__LEPPÄNEN-Timo_BestPSHANI2018_27022018.pdf |
44 | Precariously balanced rocks as indicators of seismic hazard | |
45 | Development and operation of seismic observation system in deep borehole | BestPSHANI2018_NRA_Y.Mamada.pdf |
46 | Lessons Learned from the Sinop NPP SSHAC Process | BestPSHANI2018_SinopPaper_martinetal.pdf |
47 | Scaling relationships of source parameters of inland crustal earthquakes in tectonically active regions | BestPSHANI_miya_full12_20180330submission2.pdf |
48 | Seismic Performance of Spent Fuel Pool For Reactor Triga Puspati | |
49 | ANALYSIS OF THE SPATIAL CORRELATION OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION FROM PHYSICS-BASED NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS | BestPSHANI_Paolucci_v8.docx |
50 | Earthquake cycle modeling of multi-segmented faults: dynamic rupture and ground motion simulation of the 1992 Mw 7.3 Landers earthquake | BestPSHANIpaperLanders-final.pdf |
51 | Physics Based Simulations of the M7 Kumamoto, Japan Earthquake: Implication of Rupture Models for Near-Fault Ground Motion Variability Estimates | BestPSHANI2018_Paper.docx |
52 | Recent studies on the Diendorf fault in the Czech Republic | |
53 | MUTI-LEVEL MODELLING APPROACH OF RC STRUCTURES UNDER EARTHQUAKE LOADING: CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE SINAPS@ PROJECT | BestPSHANI2018_WP3_Final_Ragueneau.pdf |
54 | progress in the understanding and modelling of components that could drive the overall fragiliy of a nuclear power plant | framatome_final.docx |
55 | Broadband (0-10 Hz) Fully Deterministic Three-Dimensional High-Performance Computing Simulations of Large Earthquake (MW 6.5-7.2) Ground Motions for Generic Strike-Slip Faults and the Hayward Fault, Northern California | |
56 | Discontinuous-mesh Finite Difference Simulations of M9 Megathrust Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone | bestpshani2018_roten_v2.pdf |
57 | Rupture scenario models in complex fault systems | Visini_et_alii_fullpaper.pdf |
58 | Gutenberg-Richter’s b-value and earthquake asperity models | Piotr_Senatorski_best_pshani_2018.pdf |
59 | GITEC project: an international benchmark to improve generalized spectral inversion techniques | GITEC_IAEA_HS_FH_db_pt.pdf |
60 | Simulation of Strong Ground Motions for M9 Megathrust Earthquake using M7 Class earthquake records as Modified Empirical Green’s Functions | BestPSHANI2018_Paper_Si-and-Irikura2.pdf |
61 | From seismic hazard to structural design and analysis: coherence of approaches | |
62 | Worst Case Scenario Rupture Models for Installation of Critical Infrastructure | |
63 | Strong pulses near source faults generated during the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes | Somei_et_al_2018BestPSHANi_proc_039_fin.pdf |
64 | Outline of the PFDHA Method and Recent Studies on PFDHA in Japan | TAKAO_submission.docx |
65 | A Preliminary Study to Investigate the Regional Effects on Ground-Motion Predictive Models for Turkey | BestPSHANI2018_TanircanFinalsubmitted.docx |
66 | The use of stochastic slip models in Probabilistic Tsunami and Displacement Hazard Analysis | |
67 | Analysis of Sub-soil Radon gas for Seismic precursor using SMARTRnDuo and comparing the Effectiveness of Soil probe and Radon exhalation chamber in detecting Sub-soil radon gas variation in Mizoram, India. | |
68 | Argostoli site, from site test to numerical model: a holistic approach | ID_68_TOUHAMI-Sara_Article_ST_FV.pdf |
69 | Framework for Non-Structural Component Fragility Curve Estimation Using Synthetic Ground Motions with Conditional Spectra | BestPSHANI2018_Paper_TrevlopoulosZentner_20190315.docx |
70 | Dynamic Rupture Simulations to Investigate the Behavior of the M7-M8 Class Earthquakes Deduced from the Tohoku Earthquake | France2018paper20180226JPAcheck1.docx |
71 | Improving the characterization of small and intermediate earthquakes through the French metropolitan territory for future physic-based rupture models | |
72 | NEW ADVANCES IN THE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT FROM THE SINAPS@ PROJECT | BestPSHANI2018_Paper-SINAPS_FRS_new_methods_FV_BR_EHS_FV.pdf |
73 | EQUIPMENT'S SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVE ESTIMATION USING SIGNALS GENERATED WITH GMPEs - CASE STUDY ON THE KASHIWAZAKI-KARIWA POWER PLANT | BestPSHANI2018_WangFeau_V1h.docx |
74 | Uncertainty analysis relevant to the fault modeling method | UncertaintyAnalysis_WU_JNRA_r6.pdf |
75 | EXAMIN: Development of an integrated approach for seismic risk and loss assessment based on “physics-based” wave propagation simulation accounting for local and regional variability. | BestPSHANI2018_Paper-EXAMIN.pdf |
76 | Conceptual Framework for Physics-Based Simulations in Practical Projects and Interface to Engineering Demands | BestPSHANI2018_Paper_Renault.docx |
77 | ANALYSIS OF THE SPATIAL CORRELATION OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION FROM PHYSICS-BASED NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS | |
78 | Should we go ahead with the response spectrum? | ID78_LABBE-Pierre_2018-BestPSHANI.pdf |